<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I agree with your sentiment. I don't feel like viewlets need to be part
of the core, but it does need a solid maintainer. Hopefully we've been
through enough iterations and v1.0 will mean more stability in grokker
creation. :)<br>
<br>
<br>
Lennart Regebro wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:319e029f0712190942m3fd1af87ke499353818a35d2b@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Dec 19, 2007 12:42 PM, Tim Terlegård
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tim.terlegard@valentinewebsystems.se"><tim.terlegard@valentinewebsystems.se></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> * viewlets
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What are the arguments for that being core grok, and not say a
megrok.viewlets thingy?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>