[ZODB-Dev] Timeout in UndoSearch
Brian R Brinegar
brinegar at ecn.purdue.edu
Wed Jan 14 16:44:28 EST 2004
Yes, each sequential batch takes longer than all previous batches combined.
-Brian
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 14:01, Brian R Brinegar wrote:
>
>>Is there something I should do so that this doesn't get lost?
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=15628&atid=115628
>
> The sourceforge bug tracker. We haven't used it for a while, but we
> should get back in the habit, particularly with new bug reports from the
> 3.3a2 release.
>
> One thing I don't understand about how undoLog() works, on reflection,
> is how it produces a link to the next set of results. Say you do a
> search, but the machine is really busy, and it times about before you
> get any results. Is there any way to restart the search where it was
> left off? It looks like undoLog() doesn't return any information about
> how much work it did, so all the work would likely be repeated in this
> case.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list