<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 15:29, Martijn Faassen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:faassen@startifact.com">faassen@startifact.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Chris McDonough wrote:<br><div class="im"><br>
> We can ameliorate the situation in a few ways:<br>
><br>
> - We can reduce the number of distributions.<br>
><br>
> - We can make each current Zope package distribution independently useful.<br>
><br>
> My suggestion is that we do the former first in order to communicate *current<br>
> intent* (the "state of reality right now"). We can do the latter after this in<br>
> pieces, hopefully aided by some new developers we've picked up by making it<br>
> easier to find useful stuff.<br>
<br>
</div>In order for your plan to work I think you'd need two things ideally:<br>
<br>
* remove a lot of the released packages from pypi. This is a no-go.<br>
People depend on these in a massive way.</blockquote><div><br>Wouldn't it be possible to put them on a dedicated pypi? <a href="http://pypi.support.zope.com">pypi.support.zope.com</a>?<br>I start being scared of using pypi.<br>
<br>Best regards,<br><br> Patrick<br></div></div><br>