On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Stephan Richter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:srichter@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu">srichter@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Monday 04 January 2010, Baiju M wrote:<br>
> I am proposing to call "Zope 3 - the web frame work"<br>
> as "BlueBream". The main use for name is documentation.<br>
> But the package named "bluebream" will not provide<br>
> any part of framework code by itself. All the framework<br>
> code will be in "zope" and "zope.app" namespaces.<br>
<br>
</div>I like the name too. As Simon suggested, a shorter "Bream" might be better.<br>
There is too much blue in technology already..<br></blockquote><div><br>+1 on just "bream" from an interested bystander. Somehow the "blue" makes me think of microsoft. And "bream" is really easy to type on a qwerty keyboard but my fingers trip badly on "bluebream". That l-u-e-b-r-e sequence is hard.<br>
<br>-Ethan<br></div></div>