[Zope-Perl] zope perl

[Chris McDonough]

I strongly agree that this would make a cool How-To if you have time,
Joseph.. a generalized support structure for this would also make a great
Product.

I suspect a lot of PHP folks would be bitten by the inability to "include"
other PHP source files from the ZODB, unless you're using DTML to do that.
Are there any other subtle limitations of your approach that you've hit?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martijn Pieters" <mj@digicool.com>
To: "Joseph Wayne Norton" <norton@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: "Chris McDonough" <chrism@digicool.com>; <zope-perl@zope.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-Perl] zope perl


> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:09:30PM +0900, Joseph Wayne Norton wrote:
> >
> > At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:39:59 -0500,
> > >
> > > Then again, I ask myself, why not use Apache?  :-)
> > >
> >
> > Just a small comment, one big advantage of such a feature is having a
> > single integrated acl mechanism (provided by zope).  We currently use
> > a mixture of apache with mod_php/mod_rewrite and zope.  We can control
> > (pretty much) all access control within zope since we are storing the
> > raw php source within zope and simply "feeding" it to mod_php.  It
> > works out pretty well since we don't have to bother with .htaccess or
> > other such mechanisms in apache.
>
> Now this would make a pretty cool How-To..
>
> --
> Martijn Pieters
> | Software Engineer  mailto:mj@digicool.com
> | Digital Creations  http://www.digicool.com/
> | Creators of Zope   http://www.zope.org/
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-perl maillist  -  Zope-perl@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-perl
>
>