Yes, it is this kind of problems thats most probably led us to think to
put objects on a temporary folder rather than in memory...<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Marco<br>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/5/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Florent Guillaume</b> <<a href="mailto:fg@nuxeo.com">fg@nuxeo.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Marco Bizzarri wrote:<br>> You mean mantaining just in the memory... uhmmm.... I should double check<br>> with the fact that the object in memory should mantain some reference to an<br>> object on the ZODB... which should be no problem at all.
<br><br>Beware, an object stored in the ZODB cannot be used by another connection to<br>the database. That means, by another thread, in the most common case. Except<br>if you're very sure about what you're doing, the only kinds of references to
<br>persistent objects you should have in memory are their paths.<br><br>Florent<br><br>--<br>Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D<br>+33 1 40 33 71 59 <a href="http://nuxeo.com">http://nuxeo.com
</a> <a href="mailto:fg@nuxeo.com">fg@nuxeo.com</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Icube Srl<br><a href="http://www.icube.it/">http://www.icube.it/</a><br>