<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/28/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jens Vagelpohl</b> <<a href="mailto:jens@dataflake.org">jens@dataflake.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>On 28 Oct 2005, at 10:26, Einar Nęss Jensen wrote:<br><br>Debian is a great distribution, no doubt, but "X works for us while Y<br>does not" is a misleading statement that creates wrong impressions.<br>It's not RedHat's fault that you weren't up to speed on some of these
<br>things.</blockquote><div><br>No. Probably not. <br>We should have had quite another aproach to the new install of redhat 9.0 three years ago. <br>The brokne rpm database we didn't manage to recover using the rpm-tools.
<br>As i remeber it, a lot of the packages installed software in places where other packages or sourcebased installs would not find it. <br>I think also the up2date procedure with logging in and register your product etc was not what we wanted
<br>Also as I remember it, at about the same time Redhat anounced the end of life for several of its products and wanted us to use The new RedHat Enterprise.<br>So there were several factors involved in the change, and probably it didn't have much to do with a bad product from RedHat.
<br>Still we dislike Redhat.<br><br>I think I have written myself way off topic no, so i'll quit here.<br><br><br><br><br></div></div>-- <br>Einar Nęss Jensen<br><a href="http://einar.nidelven-it.no/einarblog">http://einar.nidelven-it.no/einarblog
</a><br><a href="http://www.homemade.no">http://www.homemade.no</a><br>tlf: +47 90990249