<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/28/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jens Vagelpohl</b> <<a href="mailto:jens@dataflake.org">jens@dataflake.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>On 28 Oct 2005, at 08:03, Einar Nęss Jensen wrote:<br>> doesn't seem to cause any trouble. So it stays. Just to remind me<br>> never to use redhat or rpms.<br><br>How the bad RPMs you used make you blame RedHat as a whole isn't a
<br>jump I can follow... you should be blaming those people who packages<br>the RPMs and not the whole distribution.<br></blockquote></div><br>I'm sure Redhat works fine for many people in a lot of businesscritical solutions. I'm also sure Redhat is good at what they are doing.
<br>All I'm saying is: Redhat didn't work for us. Debian do.<br>Also RPM didn't work for us, while instaling from source do.<br>As i remember, redhat 9.0 introduced an error in one of the libraries which would cause the server to hang/reboot from time to time.
<br>Also we experienced a corrupt RPM database twice. Not fun at all.<br>Now this may not be redhats fault, but we suffered from it nevertheless and gave an impression of redhat's not something we want.<br clear="all"><br>
-- <br>-- <br>Einar Nęss Jensen<br><a href="http://einar.nidelven-it.no/einarblog">http://einar.nidelven-it.no/einarblog</a><br><a href="http://www.homemade.no">http://www.homemade.no</a><br>tlf: +47 90990249