<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/27 Tres Seaver <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tseaver@palladion.com">tseaver@palladion.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">Garito wrote:<br>
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja<br>
><br>
> Amazing!<br>
><br>
> I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field<br>
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja<br>
<br>
</div>I said "religious" because I meant that people have strong opinions<br>
about which style they prefer, and are not going to change them because<br>
others argue for the other style. I didn't say (or imply) that those<br>
who disagree with me are wrong / evil / stupid. I *did* say that this<br>
list is run according to the "no-munging" rules, and that it was a<br>
deliberate choice, not subject to debate.</blockquote><div><br>Making joke, man, that's the point about religious, isn't it? <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this<br>
> question<br>
<br>
</div>I don't see how my reply can be considered belligerent. Patrick asked<br>
"why doesn't the list munge 'Reply-To'?", and I replied with a link to<br>
an explanation, along with a statement that arguing the question would<br>
not be fruitful.</blockquote><div><br>I mix other conversations with that <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
> You cause the problem,<br>
<br>
If you had actually read the link I sent, you would have learned about<br>
the problems caused by munging 'Reply-To'. I have participated in<br>
*lots* of mailing lists since the early nineties: those which do munge<br>
the header are more painful, and routinely have "oops, that was supposed<br>
to be a private reply" messages show up. The damage from such messages<br>
is *much* higher than the occasional "forget to CC the list" stuff on<br>
non-munging lists. Again, this is *opinion,* shared by lots of mailing<br>
list maangers / users, but certainly not by all.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we<br>
> send you private messages by mistake<br>
<br>
</div>I don't know what you are talking about here: I didn't threaten to ban<br>
anybody. I generally ask (politely) that people keep their replies<br>
on-list, and assume that the occasional off-list reply is an honest<br>
mistake. I *have* set up filters (in my own mail processing) dropping<br>
messages from a couple of users who persist in sending me private mail<br>
after being asked to keep the traffic on the list.</blockquote><div><br>There are people that response very rude to a mistake private message <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> This kind of things are to don't take you seriously, sorry, but this cause a<br>
> very bad impression of the people of this list<br>
<br>
</div>I'm sorry you feel that way.</blockquote><div><br>I respect the opinions, yes, nothing to say about that. I respect you, all of you, sometimes the email is not a good way to express. I'm a little bit critic with some of the decisions you make because I think that Zope is the best operating system (yes, I said operating system) someone could need<br>
<br>I think I need to be as critic because when you decide to make a step far the vision of Zope I see more work I need to do for myself<br>I see Zope as a very very smart idea, a univers for my data in a very similar way as a human brain seems to work and when I see how you invest your time in another direction I sufer a lot<br>
<br>But, yes, I know that perhaps my vision of Zope is not like yours but it was, at least when I know Zope the people publish some products with the same vision<br><br>In that point I want to apologize. If I never offend you: sorry, nothing personal </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
Tres.<br>
- --<br>
===================================================================<br>
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 <a href="mailto:tseaver@palladion.com">tseaver@palladion.com</a><br>
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" <a href="http://palladion.com" target="_blank">http://palladion.com</a><br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org" target="_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a><br>
<br>
</div>iD8DBQFJ9cVx+gerLs4ltQ4RAoCdAJ9xOVCuNjNoxf5uMgTeaSQhiaXMNwCgpnvR<br>
GHTZGcy1s0hP1/HRJPxX5xE=<br>
=shhQ<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Zope maillist - <a href="mailto:Zope@zope.org">Zope@zope.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope" target="_blank">http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope</a><br>
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **<br>
(Related lists -<br>
<a href="http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce" target="_blank">http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev" target="_blank">http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev</a> )<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mis Cosas<br><a href="http://blogs.sistes.net/Garito">http://blogs.sistes.net/Garito</a><br>Zope Smart Manager<br><a href="http://blogs.sistes.net/Garito/670">http://blogs.sistes.net/Garito/670</a><br>