What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of just using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2 well still being able to use all our Zope 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12 on ZTK bridged the 2 worlds. <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Andreas Jung <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@zopyx.com">lists@zopyx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Jim Pharis wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12<br>
> on ZTK eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be<br>
> developed in a similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing<br>
> your site in instance/lib/python/<site> and wiring it all together<br>
> using the site.zcml now present in the Zope2.12 instance/etc dir.<br>
> It seems like it should be possible, but maybe not.<br>
><br>
</div>Please describe you usecase for using Zope 2 for building a Zope3/ZTK-ish<br>
application and not using the related Zope 3/ZTK components?<br>
<div class="im"><br>
- -aj<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/" target="_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</a><br>
<br>
</div>iEYEARECAAYFAks0ZUwACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwSPgCgtNHieCrAndDIbqY6JryzfZKc<br>
CNwAoLiO16+PUGpsrtH/VhogQctGDzvP<br>
=hhFu<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>