I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Andreas Jung <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@zopyx.com">lists@zopyx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Jim Pharis wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">> I want to start developing new stuff using CA paradigms in Z2.<br>
<br>
</div>So *why* Zope 2?<br>
<br>
The ZTK/Zope 3 modules provide a much cleaner<br>
basis for new projects than the Zope 2 app-server. So what is<br>
in Zope 3/ZTK missing? Why do you need a cruft of infrastructure<br>
for your new project?<br>
<br>
- -aj<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
> This seems like it should now be possible because Z2.12 itself is<br>
> now built on ZTK. However, I'm running into problems. For example,<br>
> zcml directives such as the one in<br>
> zope.app.container-3.8.0-py2.6.egg/zope/app/container/browser/meta.zcml:<br>
><br>
><br>
name="containerViews" aren't wired into Z2.12 it seems. Trying to<br>
> use <browser:containerViews throws an 'Unknown directive' error.<br>
> That's just 1 example. Well I could start wiring all this stuff<br>
> myself, it seems like that should be done already.<br>
><br>
> - Jim<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Andreas Jung <<a href="mailto:lists@zopyx.com">lists@zopyx.com</a><br>
</div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:lists@zopyx.com">lists@zopyx.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Jim Pharis wrote:<br>
>> What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2<br>
>> instead of just using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3<br>
>> now available in Zope2 well still being able to use all our Zope<br>
>> 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12 on ZTK bridged the 2<br>
>> worlds.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Do you want to develop a minimal ZTK/Zope-3 based application? So<br>
> you don't deal with the 10-year old code cruft of Zope 2 - or? What<br>
> is in the Zope 3/ZTK modules not missing?<br>
><br>
> -aj<br>
<br>
- --<br>
</div>ZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG \ zopyx group<br>
Charlottenstr. 37/1 \ The full-service network for your<br>
D-72070 Tübingen \ Python, Zope and Plone projects<br>
<a href="http://www.zopyx.com" target="_blank">www.zopyx.com</a>, <a href="mailto:info@zopyx.com">info@zopyx.com</a> \ <a href="http://www.zopyxgroup.com" target="_blank">www.zopyxgroup.com</a><br>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/" target="_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</a><br>
<br>
</div>iEYEARECAAYFAks0pMgACgkQCJIWIbr9KYzuNgCfaDpgqWOzvZNeAkHUdq6I8K5D<br>
FA4An1O5WO5982rIdmBMb8NOGPrRJ4Yp<br>
=Xapn<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>