[Zope3-dev] __init__.py interfaces.py guidelines?
Jean-Marc Orliaguet
jmo at ita.chalmers.se
Mon Nov 21 04:20:32 EST 2005
Hi!
are there any guidelines / best practises for setting the contents of
__init__.py, interfaces.py, and the packages that they import or that
they expose? there are too many alternatives and too many ways of ending
up doing circular imports and I'd like to have a consistent pattern for
reducing that risk.
but there doesn't seem to be a 100% clear pattern to follow when looking
at the zope3 code base:
some packages in have all the implementation code in __init__.py, others
have it in a file and the imports are done in __init__.py, others import
files starting with an underscore (to make them private I suppose).
some packages have an interfaces.py file others have a "interfaces"
folder, others have the interface definitions in the implementation code
itself ...
Jim mentioned to me that only public and official interface definitions
should be listed in 'interfaces', the others should be defined inline
with the implementation - are there guidelines to follow?
I like the inline option because it reduces the amount of imports and
the risk for import cycles. Does it mean that interfaces should be
defined inline with the code and those that are "official" be imported
from intertaces.py? It sounds like a good pattern.
best
/JM
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list