[BlueBream] At least we have some negative responses
mbaiju at zeomega.com
Wed Jan 20 06:34:49 EST 2010
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Gustavo Rahal
<grahal at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Em Qua, 2010-01-20 às 10:04 +0100, Hermann Himmelbauer escreveu:
>> Am Mittwoch 20 Januar 2010 06:13:57 schrieb Baiju M:
>> > Hi All,
>> > Today I started collecting negative feedbacks here:
>> > http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/NegativeFeedbacks
>> > I hope we can address those issues ?
>> Well, I personally think, that scepticism and some ranting was predictable.
>> Although comments like "Zope changing it's name to BlueBream? Sounds even
>> more retarded..." are dispensable, I think our reaction to such polemic
>> should be threefold:
>> 1) Don't directly answer to such comments - it's a waste of time
>> 2) Understand, that what people really say is: "I doubt that changing the name
>> only will help" - and they are right: What changes things are facts and not
>> names, so simply let's go on with the roadmap on which end there is not only
>> a name but a usable product.
>> 3) Maybe the documentation could have some explanation where what technology
>> fits in. This way people may actually understand better what this is about.
>> Some suggestion about this can be seen in the attachment, although it is
>> probably incomplete. Having such a thing on the Zope website itself, whereas
>> these boxes could be actual links to the project sites could help, too.
>> Best Regards,
> +1 for comments and diagram concept. Ignoring rant and trying to grasp
> part of the underling message is important (like what comment 2 did).
For now, I put a slightly modified version here:
Can anyone can add few sentences there, so that we can put it in our main
More information about the bluebream