[BlueBream] working with Grok
faassen at startifact.com
Fri Jan 22 09:20:44 EST 2010
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Baiju M <mbaiju at zeomega.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
>> I just subscribed to the BlueBream list as I think Grok has a lot in
>> common with BlueBream.
> Welcome to BlueBream's list :)
>> Very glad to see this effort, and hopefully we
>> can find many ways to share code, resources and work.
> We have some fundamental difference in handling configuration
> (declarative vs imperative) But, I believe we can work together
> as Grok & BlueBream use ZTK.
Both Grok's martian and ZCML are in my opinion declarative methods of
configuration. The underlying effect is a zope.configuration
configuration action in both cases. Grok just gets the configuration
from another place.
It would be nice to add "imperative" configuration APIs to the ZTK. In
fact the API goes beyond configuration. You'd have stuff like:
i.e. besides registration there should also be an API to look up the object.
This would be a native API for the fundamental concepts in the ZTK
instead of only low-level component registrations.
We could then build both the ZCML directive implementation as well as
Grok's configuration system on top of this new imperative API. We
could also modify things like the publisher to use the new lookup APIs
(in fact this implies the view lookup API belongs in the publisher).
* it's a lot of work, requiring a lot of careful thought. It should
also go into the right place; we don't want a mega-package for this
API I think.
* we've had attempts at this in the past which failed (zapi, ztapi).
These didn't add much while gratuitously making configuration harder.
We've had to struggle to remove them.
It's possible this would become easier if we rewrote the whole
publishing infrastructure entirely, replacing the old one. That's
risky and difficult in other ways, of course. :)
More information about the bluebream