[Checkins] SVN: grok/trunk/TODO.txt Separate out formlib related todo items.

[Martijn Faassen]

Log message for revision 71349:
  Separate out formlib related todo items.
  

Changed:
  U   grok/trunk/TODO.txt

-=-
Modified: grok/trunk/TODO.txt
===================================================================
--- grok/trunk/TODO.txt	2006-11-30 22:52:26 UTC (rev 71348)
+++ grok/trunk/TODO.txt	2006-11-30 22:52:36 UTC (rev 71349)
@@ -34,28 +34,37 @@
 
 - grok.App (philikon)
 
-- forms / schema driven development (faassen, wosc)
-  * list form for grok.Container (w/ zc.table?)
-  * delete action on list form
-  * add form
-  
-  * custom templates for forms (make formlib macros available in some form?)
-  * support nested class 'fields' directly on a view (do we really want this?)
-
-- provide custom (better looking) template and styles for formlib 
-
 - error reporting during grokking (provide file/line-number information
   on our extrinsically generated errors) (philikon)
 
 - FooBase convention + grok.baseclass to not grok certain classes
 
 - maybe: transform register_foo() functions that take lists into functions
-  that operate on a single entity and provide a decorator (@iterate) to 
+  that operate on a single entity and provide a decorator (@iterate) to
   call the function for each item (theuni)
 
 - grok.utility() needs to work on module level so we can register imported
   objects as global utilities.
 
+Schema/formlib support
+----------------------
+
+- support rendering a form from an interface
+
+- support nested class 'fields' directly on a view (do we really want this?)
+
+- provide default (better looking) template and styles for formlib in grok
+
+- custom templates for forms
+
+- add form
+
+- list form for grok.Container (w/ zc.table?)
+
+- delete action on list form
+
+- make formlib macros available in some form?
+
 Need to discuss
 ---------------
 
@@ -114,6 +123,10 @@
 
 - page template reloads without having to restart
 
+- Do we want to initialize model attributes for any schema that the model
+  implements (in addition to the initialization that is taking place for the
+  model-level fields)?
+
 Punt
 ----