[Checkins] SVN: zope3docs/ Fix ReST warnings.
Christian Theune
ct at gocept.com
Thu Feb 19 04:52:41 EST 2009
Log message for revision 96731:
Fix ReST warnings.
Changed:
_U zope3docs/
U zope3docs/source/codingstyle/writingtests.rst
-=-
Property changes on: zope3docs
___________________________________________________________________
Added: bzr:revision-info
+ timestamp: 2009-02-19 10:51:31.335999966 +0100
committer: Christian Theune <ct at gocept.com>
properties:
branch-nick: zope3docs.bzr
Added: bzr:file-ids
+ source/codingstyle/writingtests.rst 96696 at 62d5b8a3-27da-0310-9561-8e5933582275:zope3docs:source%2Fcodingstyle%2Fwritingtests.rst
Added: bzr:text-parents
+
Added: bzr:revision-id:v3-single-zope3docs
+ 16 ct at gocept.com-20090219095131-k60befy2nrfx9q99
Modified: zope3docs/source/codingstyle/writingtests.rst
===================================================================
--- zope3docs/source/codingstyle/writingtests.rst 2009-02-19 09:32:35 UTC (rev 96730)
+++ zope3docs/source/codingstyle/writingtests.rst 2009-02-19 09:52:41 UTC (rev 96731)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
Within the unit tests themselves, the Zope3 style is to use
the positive rather than the double negative assertions.
-Thus, use 'assertEqual' rather than 'failUnlessEqual',
-'assertRaises' rather than 'failUnlessRaises', and 'assert_'
-rather than 'failUnless'. (Yes, 'assert_' is an ugly name,
+Thus, use ``assertEqual`` rather than ``failUnlessEqual``,
+``assertRaises`` rather than ``failUnlessRaises``, and ``assert_``
+rather than ``failUnless``. (Yes, ``assert_`` is an ugly name,
but it is still preferred.)
There are certain other "Best Practices" the following of which
More information about the Checkins
mailing list