[Checkins] SVN: grokcore.view/trunk/ Backwards compatibility alias for CodeView.
Martijn Faassen
faassen at startifact.com
Thu Sep 17 03:44:17 EDT 2009
Log message for revision 104162:
Backwards compatibility alias for CodeView.
Changed:
U grokcore.view/trunk/CHANGES.txt
U grokcore.view/trunk/src/grokcore/view/components.py
-=-
Modified: grokcore.view/trunk/CHANGES.txt
===================================================================
--- grokcore.view/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2009-09-17 07:36:26 UTC (rev 104161)
+++ grokcore.view/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2009-09-17 07:44:17 UTC (rev 104162)
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
View components will now again behave like it did up until the latest alpha
release of Grok.
+ ``CodeView`` is still available as a backwards compatibility alias
+ for ``View``. Please update all references to ``CodeView`` to
+ ``View``.
+
- Fix the template registry and grokker for views to let View and
other components using View as base class to be associated with a
template directly by setting it as 'template' attribute on the view
@@ -26,6 +30,8 @@
template = grokcore.view.PageTemplate('<p>hello</p>')
+ This isn't exactly *officially* supported but enough people depend
+ on it and have documented it so that we don't want to just break it.
1.11 (2009-09-15)
-----------------
Modified: grokcore.view/trunk/src/grokcore/view/components.py
===================================================================
--- grokcore.view/trunk/src/grokcore/view/components.py 2009-09-17 07:36:26 UTC (rev 104161)
+++ grokcore.view/trunk/src/grokcore/view/components.py 2009-09-17 07:44:17 UTC (rev 104162)
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@
render.base_method = True
+# backwards compatibility. Probably not needed by many, but just in case.
+# please start using grokcore.view.View again.
+CodeView = View
class BaseTemplate(object):
"""Any sort of page template"""
More information about the checkins
mailing list