[Grok-dev] Re: First grok package
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 14 14:19:29 EDT 2007
Darryl Cousins wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 08:03 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> but as a suggestion you should make your top
>> README.txt contain a bit more information about what it does. As far
>> I understand it's a kind of content management system, right?
> And Grokstar has no README at all! :-)
Excellent point. :) I just added a minimal readme.
> But - quite right, thanks for pointing that out. Not to mention lack of
> version, packaging, dependencies, install, public svn, homepage,
> contributors etc etc. ;)
> Just playing with grok. An' luvin' it.
That's great to hear!
> Probably no suprises for you in the code. Nice though that I found
> **no** bugs in using grok. And - no zcml beyond <grok ... />. Cool.
It's great to have another codebase available that uses Grok. Would it
be okay if Kevin placed a link to this application on the grok homepage?
More information about the Grok-dev