[Grok-dev] Re: RFC: Grokking tests

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Fri Mar 30 17:11:04 EDT 2007

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Maybe we still require 
>> people put them in modules or packages 'tests' and 'ftests' as Grok's 
>> convention (and Zope 3's, in fact).
> (that convention is going away, btw)

Sounds like a useful convention for Grok in any case. It ensures tests 
are always in a predictable place and we can deduce things from it. :)



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list