[Grok-dev] Re: static versus Zope 3's directory resources
janwijbrand at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 03:07:14 EST 2007
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> (personally I think it could very well be in Grok itself.)
> Both :).
> I think we want to split up Grok for it to be more modular. This is a
> perfect example of a single, self-contained piece of functionality that
> makes sense to be shipped with *and* without Grok.
> I would personally like to tackle to split-up of Grok pretty soon. I've
> done an experiment a while back already and it worked well. The lessons
> learned have been incorporated into the 0.11 release already. My plans
> are to start with splitting off the ZCML directive implementation and
> the registration of core components (adapters, utilities, subscribers)
> before the year is over...
So, as a practical result of the split, you could imagine to have a
"grok.resources" package at some point?
More information about the Grok-dev