[Grok-dev] Re: static versus Zope 3's directory resources
wichert at wiggy.net
Mon Nov 26 09:42:17 EST 2007
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> >Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> >>>(personally I think it could very well be in Grok itself.)
> >>Both :).
> >>I think we want to split up Grok for it to be more modular. This is a
> >>perfect example of a single, self-contained piece of functionality
> >>that makes sense to be shipped with *and* without Grok.
> >>I would personally like to tackle to split-up of Grok pretty soon.
> >>I've done an experiment a while back already and it worked well. The
> >>lessons learned have been incorporated into the 0.11 release already.
> >>My plans are to start with splitting off the ZCML directive
> >>implementation and the registration of core components (adapters,
> >>utilities, subscribers) before the year is over...
> >So, as a practical result of the split, you could imagine to have a
> >"grok.resources" package at some point?
> Right. We can't make 'grok' a namespace package, though, because it
> contains code in __init__. We'll have to use something else. Martijn
> wants to use grokcore.
Is this really tied to grok? It sounds like it could just as well be a
Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
More information about the Grok-dev