[Grok-dev] Re: Admin UI name change suggestion

Leonardo Rochael Almeida leorochael at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 15:30:31 EDT 2007


>From the point of view of a user who just wants to get up and running
fast, an auto-installed application + an http server who serve the
application as root is indistinguishable from an application that
actually takes over the root, and we don't need to implement something
that deviates so much from the status quo (a ZODB root that is not the
usual Zope3 root).

Cheers, Leo

On 10/4/07, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> Hey,
> [snip]
> > I agree with these observations, *however*, there needs to be a way to
> > make "taking over the zope root" optionally in a very easy way: I
> > forsee people do want to have multiple applications running in a Zope
> > instance - I know I will need this option.
> >
> > Maybe we can introduce a grok.ApplicationRoot that will "take over"
> > the zope root, where grok.Application retains the current behaviour?
> I still like Shane's plan as he spelled it out, earlier.
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.grok.devel/2337
> What do people think about this?
> I think we need to retain the ability to install multiple applications
> into a single site, and the ability to go "underwater" to remove buggy
> applications sound useful as well. We just need an easy way to make one
> of these the default.
> Regards,
> Martijn
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list