[Grok-dev] Re: grok_component gone after actions refactoring?
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Oct 10 13:10:12 EDT 2007
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Yeah, that makes sense. I actually changed my mind between then and now,
> and grok_component isn't that non-sensical anymore :). I brought it
> back, with the original tests passing just fine.
> I will explain my refactorings in an email to the list soon.
Thanks, that'll be interesting. Thanks for doing all this work, it looks
like you made a lot of progress starting off Godefroid's work.
> I do think, however, that grok_component should move to grok.tests since
> it's really meant for testing. Especially the way it's currently
> implemented. Would that be ok with you?
Wouldn't grok.testing be a better place for this? Or did you mean this?
More information about the Grok-dev