[Grok-dev] Re: grok_component gone after actions refactoring?

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Wed Oct 10 13:10:12 EDT 2007


Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Yeah, that makes sense. I actually changed my mind between then and now, 
> and grok_component isn't that non-sensical anymore :). I brought it 
> back, with the original tests passing just fine.
> I will explain my refactorings in an email to the list soon.

Thanks, that'll be interesting. Thanks for doing all this work, it looks 
like you made a lot of progress starting off Godefroid's work.

> I do think, however, that grok_component should move to grok.tests since 
> it's really meant for testing. Especially the way it's currently 
> implemented. Would that be ok with you?

Wouldn't grok.testing be a better place for this? Or did you mean this?



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list