[Grok-dev] Re: Release naming convention revisited...
faassen at startifact.com
Mon Oct 15 09:56:51 EDT 2007
Sebastian Ware wrote:
> But it is still confusing with regards to the maturity of the code.
> Haven't we overintellectualised this, rather than kept it simple and
> intuitive for the casual observer?
No, I think we're doing it the right way. major.minor.bugfix is a very
common pattern in the software release world and I see no reason to
deviate from this.
I agree though that things like 0.10 are ugly. We'll get to 1.0 soon
enough though, so we can dump that ugliness.
More information about the Grok-dev