[Grok-dev] Re: branches review

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Tue Oct 16 06:59:52 EDT 2007


Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> philikon-reload - Philipp
>> -------------------------
>> Code-reload support for Grok. I had the impression that we discovered 
>> that this approach was fundamentally flawed. If that's correct, is it 
>> still worth retaining this branch?
> Not really, though I strongly believe we need some sort of reload, 
> albeit using a different approach. Removed the branch.

I agree. Either that, or a vastly improved restart time - not having to 
wait this is still a big advantage of TTW development for many people.

>> regebro-guido-templates - Lennart, Guido Wesdorp
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> Support for plugging in Genshi and potentially other template 
>> languages into Grok. I have the impression this branch is quite far 
>> along. Is this only waiting for a review, or does more work need to be 
>> done before we can merge this one?
> Let's see if we can get it merged soon. That means we should discuss the 
> status and review it. If we can get this branch and the actions branch 
> merged, I think we should do a 0.11.

I'd like to get the REST branch merged for 0.11 too.

I looked at the template language branch briefly last night, so I'll 
start a thread with my comments.



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list