[Grok-dev] inspect.html versus inspect in admin UI
kevin at mcweekly.com
Wed Sep 12 16:58:00 EDT 2007
It's a little more typing, but how about using a prefix?
Uli Fouquet wrote:
> Hi there,
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2007, 18:06 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
>> Hi there,
>> Today I noticed that the admin UI's object browser uses the view name
>> inspect.html. Grok tends to consistently use view names without
>> extensions, so just inspect should be sufficient. Plus it's slightly
>> easier to type /inspect to get the inspector.
> The intention was not to block the 'inspect' view name for application
>> Eventually we might get in trouble with applications that want to define
>> their own 'inspect', but it's not a huge problem so let's cross that
>> bridge when we get there.
> The cleaner solution might be to do a different traversal and to use a
> pseudo-namespace of some kind, like the class browser does. This,
> however, would mean a broader effort.
> Anyway, it's not a big thing to change the view name to 'inspect'. I'll
> do it tonight if no further objections appear.
> Kind regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Grok-dev