[Grok-dev] Re: letting Grok take over the site

Shane Hathaway shane.list.grok-dev at hathawaymix.org
Wed Sep 19 19:19:39 EDT 2007

Uli Fouquet wrote:
> Introducing a new namespace ++app++ from my point of view does not sound
> too appropriate for the kind of problem we have (again, I might be wrong
> here). If every application (including the admin UI) is installed under
> a certain name, it is possible to access every application using this
> name. The modified traverser's job would then be, to 'map' one of those
> apps to the root. I may have missed the point here, but do we then still
> need an extra namespace here, if the admin UI would be a seperate
> application with an own name?

Once you have mapped a different application to the root, how do you
access the grok admin UI again, let alone other application instances?
++app++ is one possible solution.

> Until we have a real solution there is also the possibility Plone and
> CPS users are used to: change the virtual host root.

Agreed.  Besides, someone might come up with an even better idea.


More information about the Grok-dev mailing list