[Grok-dev] Re: grok and complicated permissions
janwijbrand at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 02:37:25 EDT 2007
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> That said, I know there is an interest in seeing this work with Grok
> though. Grok should definitely not be standing in the way of making this
> work (currently its own publication rips off security proxies, and this
> behavior should become optional). Perhaps a security system where
> methods are public by default, and a @grok.require decorator system to
> annotate such methods with permissions, is actually workable.
> Experimentation awaits us.
As an aside note: this is an issue I proposed as one of the topics for
the upcomming sprint (next week). I hope we can get some people together
to look into it.
More information about the Grok-dev