[Grok-dev] Re: grok and complicated permissions

[Jan-Wijbrand Kolman]

Martijn Faassen wrote:
snip
> That said, I know there is an interest in seeing this work with Grok 
> though. Grok should definitely not be standing in the way of making this 
> work (currently its own publication rips off security proxies, and this 
> behavior should become optional). Perhaps a security system where 
> methods are public by default, and a @grok.require decorator system to 
> annotate such methods with permissions, is actually workable. 
> Experimentation awaits us.
snip

As an aside note: this is an issue I proposed as one of the topics for 
the upcomming sprint (next week). I hope we can get some people together 
to look into it.

kind regards,
jw