[Grok-dev] Re: final sprint report - please review my branch!
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Tue Apr 8 06:06:41 EDT 2008
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>>> you did a great job with the branch. My plans are to finish this
>>>> work during the Grokkerdam sprint (e.g. split-away grokcore.config),
>>>> if that's ok with you.
>>> Philipp, do you think that we Plonistas which want to bring grok
>>> martians to Zope2 could and/or should tackle this at the Paris sprint ?
>>> IOW, do you think grokcore.config is a prerequisite (or would ease a
>>> lot) for Zope 2 work ?
>> While that would be fine with me, I also want to offer an alternative
>> proposal. I have no preference for either scenario, just wanted to
>> mention it.
>> I think it would be a reasonable approach to work with
>> grokcore.component as-is at the Paris sprint. The code you'll write
>> will most likely remain compatible after Philipp does his work. This
>> is because the APIs are quite stable.
Exactly. I was going to suggest the same thing.
> Your proposal is also fine with me. And if needed, we can fix the Zope 2
> layer while at Grokkerdam.
Note that grokcore.component will work as-is in Zope 2. There shouldn't
be anything you'd have to do to make it work, which means, of course,
you can start building the Plone-specific stuff on top of it.
P.S.: On a technical note, I should add that I'm not entirely satisfied
with some of the details, for instance the "Context" base class that was
introduced. So some details may change.
More information about the Grok-dev