[Grok-dev] on the name "Grok"
wichert at wiggy.net
Mon Apr 28 09:05:47 EDT 2008
Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> There is also 'plone.grok'. This provides plone-specific components and
> grokkers, dealing with Plone specific concepts such as portlets. In
> order to use it, you import from it. I think this name is very *wrong*.
> It leads people to believe that these base classes exist in Grok, which
> they do not. It's not implementing standard Grok concepts at all, but
> extends Grok. It therefore the namespace shouldn't have 'grok' in it.
> Ideally it's just something that is folded into existing Plone packages.
Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
More information about the Grok-dev