[Grok-dev] Re: Grok nomenclature
Brandon Craig Rhodes
brandon at rhodesmill.org
Wed Apr 30 12:15:33 EDT 2008
Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> writes:
> I think we should investigate a way to signal that we want
> auto-registration for existing classes (that you now register using
It can't just register everything for which it can't find a ZCML
directive? :-) I suppose that would create chaos.
> If you say...
> class MyPortletAssignment(base.Assignment):
> It'll be grokked...
But that's ugly! Surely we want: :-)
Brandon Craig Rhodes brandon at rhodesmill.org http://rhodesmill.org/brandon
More information about the Grok-dev