[Grok-dev] Re: Grok nomenclature
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Apr 30 14:21:26 EDT 2008
Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
> Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> writes:
>> I think we should investigate a way to signal that we want
>> auto-registration for existing classes (that you now register using
> It can't just register everything for which it can't find a ZCML
> directive? :-) I suppose that would create chaos.
Yes, that'd be chaos. :)
The set of problems we have to do deal with when updating a legacy Zope
2 or Zope 3 application where we *do* want grokkers is quite different
than the typical Grok problem.
>> If you say...
>> class MyPortletAssignment(base.Assignment):
>> It'll be grokked...
> But that's ugly! Surely we want: :-)
> class MyPortletAssignment(base.Assignment):
Heh, cute. :)
More information about the Grok-dev