todd at infrae.com
Tue Dec 9 09:57:23 EST 2008
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Todd <todd at infrae.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I'm trying to compile a list of bugs pertinent to 1.0 release. Looking
>> at all the bugs for grok there are many bugs that have status 'New' but
>> haven't been confirmed or assigned to anyone. Some are pretty old. What
>> should I do with these bugs.
> I think they should be assigned to people so that they can decide
> whether to fix or not fix the bug for the 1.0 release (or to reject
> the report all together).
> The problem then of course is, who to assign the bugs too?
> I volunteer to be assigned to a one third of the bugs in your list, as
> an invitation to two other persons to also volunteer to be assigned.
> Once assigned we can review the bug reports, fix legitimate bugs,
> reject reports or discuss the matter on the mailinglist.
> Would this be a workable aproach?
Sounds good to me, I think I'm also going to set them all to 1.0
More information about the Grok-dev