[Grok-dev] Re: license for docs
faassen at startifact.com
Sat Jan 26 19:13:37 EST 2008
Kevin Teague wrote:
> I've just removed the GFDL Copyright from the site. (This can be set
> globally for the /documentation/ section by setting the Copyright field
> The ZPL is a software license, how well does it apply to content?
It's not ideal. It's not terrible either, as it's a pretty liberal
> Zope 3 book and Zope Guide use the Creative Commons license, while the
> rest of the Zope 3 wiki content is unlicensed:
> Maybe we should leave the global Documentation license empty? We can
> then either embed the appropriate license within the content or use the
> Content Licensing add-on for Plone
> (http://plone.org/products/contentlicensing) to denote the desired license?
I think leaving out a global documentation license would be best for
now. That'd just make the text copyrighted without license for reuse.
Eventually that'd give us some trouble should non-authors want to edit
or update the text, however. I think a creative commons license might
make for a reasonable default.
Would the Content Licensing add-on allow an easy way for people to set
the desired license for the content? Or alternatively, any standard way
to include license info in a text using ReST?
> If we have a global ZPL content license and someone documents using Grok
> with non-ZPL'ed parts, such as KSS, Storm, SQLAlchemy, etc. and includes
> snippets of source code from those projects is that a license conflict?
I'd consider snippets of code fair use. It's actually quite unlikely
that these snippets would be taken directly from those projects code
bases anyway. I don't see much risk for license conflicts (the ZPL
doesn't tend to conflict with other licenses much anyway).
More information about the Grok-dev