[Grok-dev] Re: The shared hosting story, in print anyone?
sebastian at urbantalk.se
Sun Jan 27 11:37:02 EST 2008
Ok, I can understand that the concept of traditional "shared hosting"
is not applicable to Grok/Zope. But the problem will still be there.
Regardless of approach, supporting a feasible solution is likely to
increase adoption. Maybe we can define a simple "gold standard"
hosting product that hosting companies can choose to adopt.
26 jan 2008 kl. 22.55 skrev Martijn Faassen:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> It isn't that I'm *hostile* to the idea of running Zope-based apps on
>> such boxes: I'm just skeptical.
> I agree that this one is tough and it's not likely we can fix this
> in the Zope world in the foreseeable future. At this point I don't
> think we can do better than Rails in the Zope world and we shouldn't
> give wrong impressions.
> That said, I think even investigating making this better is useful:
> it may make our life better in some other ways even if we don't
> reach the goal of making shared hosting easier.
> I did follow the original Ruby on Rails discussion. I think Ian
> Bicking's observations are useful:
> Perhaps there is some potential in having mod_wsgi running isolated
> ZEO client processes and having it kill them off painlessly in case
> of problems. It'll still be less manageable than PHP, where there is
> no long-running application server process to worry about at all,
> and thus, as far as I understand, not much need to kill anything off
> in case of problems.
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
More information about the Grok-dev