[Grok-dev] Re: grokcore.view feedback

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Sat Jul 19 17:08:14 EDT 2008

Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> I planned to propose to move Forms in a separate package 
> ('grokcore.formlib' ?) to avoid unneeded dependencies.
> And similarly, to move viewlets to 'grokcore.viewlets'.

Sure, I think that's reasonable (the names as well). Factoring out the 
form bits from grokcore.view into grokcore.formlib sounds like a good idea.

grokcore.viewlets will likely end up depending on grokcore.view for the 
template infrastructure and such, so one can debate whether the split is 
very useful, but it won't hurt either.

Soon nothing will be left in Grok at all anymore. :)



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list