[Grok-dev] Re: Layer and skin registrations; possible simplification

Philipp von Weitershausen philipp at weitershausen.de
Fri Jul 25 06:44:34 EDT 2008

Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> snip
>> Why is there IGrokLayer? Let's deprecate that as well. As far as I can 
>> tell, it bears no use whatsoever. If people are worried about having 
>> to import a base interface, then let's expose IBrowserRequest from 
>> grok. Because that's what you should use to base layers and skins on 
>> anyways.
> I agree. I just wanted to focus on one specific issue for now :) As far 
> as I can see now, the IGrokLayer is just way of communicating intent.

Right. I wonder why it's called IGrokLayer then, not Layer or ILayer... 
Anyway, I think it's a sacrificial chicken that I don't think we need in 

But you're right, better focus on that other thing for now.

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list