[Grok-dev] Re: grok.subscribe() typo in developers notes?

Philipp von Weitershausen philipp at weitershausen.de
Sun Jun 15 09:45:51 EDT 2008

Danny Navarro wrote:
> While going through the developers notes I found that there were some 
> code samples where grok.subscribe() is used as a normal function not as 
> a decorator. I think the @ for decorator is missing.

Indeed. Is this document maintained on the website or in SVN? Can 
somebody please fix this?

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list