[Grok-dev] Re: grok.Interface?
faassen at startifact.com
Thu Jun 26 07:38:17 EDT 2008
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Kevin Teague wrote:
>> Has making zope.interface.Interface available as grok.Interface been
>> But I like the idea of doing fewer imports for very commonly used
>> stuff :)
> Personally I would be against this. I generally do not even use:
> but use:
> from zope import interface
> since it makes learning about what *Zope* *is* and what it provides easier.
Well, it's a balance between convenience and separation of concerns.
There's a bit of a sliding scale here - if we have grok.Interface, what
about schemas? grok.Text? Yes, no?
While of course interfaces are a pretty central concept in Zope, I'm not
sure whether a separate importing of zope.interface makes learning what
Zope is that much easier, myself. Certainly in your case it won't help
*you* any to do what you do, as you already know where implements comes
from yourself. :)
More information about the Grok-dev