[Grok-dev] Re: STORM howto
sebastian at urbantalk.se
Fri Mar 14 03:32:48 EDT 2008
Just for the record. The benchmark that you referenced was disputed.
It turns out that SQLAlchemy performed 400 commits for one commit in
Storm and 0 (BUG) in GeniuSQL. Updated tests (note: by SQLAlchemy
people) can be found here:
original tests as noted:
13 mar 2008 kl. 23.24 skrev Fernando Correa Neto:
> Hey :)
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
> <philipp at weitershausen.de> wrote:
>> Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Martin Aspeli <optilude at gmx.net>
>>>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>>>> Christian (Klinger), Sebastian, and Brandon too:
>>>>> I just started a discussion on the Storm mailing list with some
>>>>> questions. I'm exploring whether Storm could make for a good
>>>>> relational database integration layer for Grok.
>>>> Has anyone done a comparison between Storm and SQLAlchemy? The
>>>> seems to be more popular (anecdotally) and widely adopted, and I
>>>> attest that it's a joy to work with, but I've never used (or hardly
>>>> heard of) Storm.
>>> While ago I was evaluating both and picked up Storm due to its good
>>> participation in zope3 transactaion machinery.
>> It isn't too terribly hard to do get SQLAlchemy to do the same. The
>> z3c.zalchemy package provides some code here, for instance.
>>> While doing that, I've
>>> found this  which showed the good and the bad from both.
>> Would you mind sharing with us what  is? :)
> Yes :)
>  http://aminus.org/blogs/index.php/fumanchu/2007/08/18/storm_sqlalchemy_and_geniusql
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
More information about the Grok-dev