[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 19 17:44:36 EDT 2008
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>> Typically we use functional tests to assert any kind of ZCML
>>> configuration. In the case of grokcore.component, this would probably
>>> be overkill.
>> I actually believe there's no need for a configure.zcml at all for
> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is
> justified, though it would be very short:
> <grok package=".meta" />
That should be in meta.zcml, right?
More information about the Grok-dev