[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 19 17:46:38 EDT 2008
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is
>> justified, though it would be very short:
>> <grok package=".meta" />
> Actually, this should probably be in a grokcore.component's meta.zcml.
> So it seems you were right, after all, Martijn :)
Right so, to conclude:
meta.zcml should contain the 'grok' directive. It registers grokkers,
and registering grokkers is the equivalent of setting up new directives.
configure.zcml is not there.
More information about the Grok-dev