[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob

Dirceu Pereira Tiegs dirceutiegs at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 17:59:41 EDT 2008

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
>  I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
>  responsibilities:
>  collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
>  subclassing/configuration that allows..
>  collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
>  collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
>   in extra dependencies
>  megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile

Almost done:


I will try to finish and release it today.

Dirceu Pereira Tiegs
Weimar Consultoria

Hospedagem Plone, Zope e Python

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list