[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 19 18:18:50 EDT 2008
Dirceu Pereira Tiegs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
>> I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
>> collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
>> subclassing/configuration that allows..
>> collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
>> collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
>> in extra dependencies
>> megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile
> Almost done:
> I will try to finish and release it today.
More information about the Grok-dev