[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Thu Mar 20 03:57:05 EDT 2008
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>>> Typically we use functional tests to assert any kind of ZCML
>>>> configuration. In the case of grokcore.component, this would
>>>> probably be overkill.
>>> I actually believe there's no need for a configure.zcml at all for
>> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is
>> justified, though it would be very short:
>> <grok package=".meta" />
> That should be in meta.zcml, right?
Yes, you were right
More information about the Grok-dev