[Grok-dev] Re: Salt & z3c.autoinclude
faassen at startifact.com
Tue Mar 25 08:09:41 EDT 2008
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[proposed directive name changes]
> +1 for this, though I'm not sure if we have live users of this thing
> that need to be migrated?
> Perhaps <autoinclude /> could be a convenience directive that does
> *both* <autoincludeDependencies /> and <autoincludePlugins />?
> I don't mind longish names if they are descriptive and accurate,
Nope, no real live users yet (only trunk users), so we should be fine.
I'm fine with dumping 'autoinclude' and introducing
'includeDependencies'. I don't think we need a convenience directive
that does both either - there's not much convenience added and
potentially surprising to a developer that external plugins to his app
are suddenly loaded too in addition to his dependencies.
More information about the Grok-dev