[Grok-dev] Re: functional test fails
uli at gnufix.de
Tue May 13 06:34:25 EDT 2008
Santiago Videla wrote:
> I created a launchpad issue for it:
> Someone should add zope.app.securitypolicy back to the Grok
> 0.12 branch, and to the trunk (a modification of setup.py and
> versions.cfg should be enough, just adding
> zope.app.securitypolicy again)
> Hi there,
> did you see this?
> I sent an email to the list a few weeks ago
> ( http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/2008-April/004669.html )
> I understand that Uli Fouquet updated the grokproject to just use the
> zope.security. Uli, am I right?
Yes, I did, although it is not released yet and could be undone. This
however, would not be a good idea from my point of view.
If I understood Martijn's proposal right, Grok should come with both
packages, zope.app.securitypolicy _and_ zope.securitypolicy. Is that
correct, Martijn? I did a quick check and both packages seem to be able
to live in peace with each other.
Removing zope.securitypolicy in the next Grok release would mean to
break projects based on Grok 0.12 and looks worse to me than switching
from the older package to the newer, as it happened with the 0.12
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/attachments/20080513/27b3ec1f/attachment.bin
More information about the Grok-dev