[Grok-dev] Re: we need a MethodGrokker
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Fri May 16 14:35:09 EDT 2008
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey Philipp,
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> [... a lot of sense ...]
>> I was thinking the same thing when I made the refactoring. I don't
>> have much else to say, I think I agree comple.... CRASH BANG BOOM
>> KRZZZZ FYOOP SLURP FIZZZ (this is the universe imploding due to this
>> anomaly :)).
> We actually agree most of the time, it's just sometimes we need a while
> to communicate what we actually agree on. :)
Right. The anomaly here is that we didn't spend a huge thread arguing
> Okay, looks like we can proceed to do some more fun and games in
> Martian. Are you interested in hacking on this?
> I don't have a lot of time to dive into this right now, but it'd be
> nice if we could land it in 0.13.
More information about the Grok-dev