[Grok-dev] Grok 1.0 final?

Wichert Akkerman wichert at wiggy.net
Wed Apr 15 06:21:08 EDT 2009

Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > -0 see below.
> > -1
> > +1
> Let's have that discussion on the Plone list at a later time when a 
> proper proposal has been developed. I was merely giving some context on 
> a possible scenario, for the purpose of seeing if/how it aligns with 
> Grok's plans, not proposing something concrete for Plone at this stage.

The shadowing applies just as much to grok as it might do to Plone at
some point.

> > The current naming in grok has always been a big turnoff for me, and I
> > was sad to see it appear in plone dexterity as well. With namespaces and
> > eggs we already have too many directories, and this adds even more.
> How would you like it to work?

templates/<context id>_<view id>.html

where context id probably defaults to the __name__ of the view context,
and view id to the name of the view. I prefer to use html as extension
for attribute based template languages (genshi, tal, kid, etc.) so tools
such as html editors and browsers know how to handle the file.


Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list