[Grok-dev] Final touches for a 1.0 "proper"
sebastian at urbantalk.se
Tue Sep 29 10:50:40 EDT 2009
If someone can tell me what the proper formating should look like (I
am hopeless at ReST-formating) for text in a alertish-style box then
I, Tim and Steve can mark docs as possibly outdated. I will be able to
spend an hour on this tomorrow.
We obviously need help after that from people who could review these
docs properly. Anybody who would can help with reviewing, just post
your LaunchpadID and grok.zope.org username on the [Grok-doc] mailing
list with a note that you want to check docs for 1.0 compatibility.
On 29 sep 2009, at 16.20, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Sebastian Ware wrote:
>> I believe we still have community documentation that isn't updated.
>> The least we should do is clearly mark them as
>> "This document hasn't been verified with Grok 1.0 and may be
>> Preferably with an explanation on the community docs process and link
>> to the Grok-doc information.
>> If we don't do this, it will reflect badly on the great work that has
>> been done. I would argue that this is a show stopper.
> So how do we resolve this situation? I'm fine with people marking the
> documentation this way, but you need to organize an effort to do so,
> right? Who is going to organize this?
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
More information about the Grok-dev